No Casino Gettysburg

Save Our Historic, Family Friendly Community

WE WON!

saved again

Debt is PAID!

donation thank you

how we won

PGCB denial reasons

A casino WHERE?!

How to Help

Opposition

Position Papers

It's A Bad Idea!

National Groups Help

Editorials

Living History

PRESS Releases- LATEST

Press Releases -archive

Empty Promises

Gambling

The Investors

The COMPETITION

Crossroads Hearing

Politics

Businesses Against Casino

Petitions

Our Values

Contact/ Links

Dec 20, after PGCB rejects Crossroads, Forum, Harrisburg
WE WON!
On Dec 20, 2006 THE PA Gaming Control Board Voted NO CASINO GETTYSBURG.
The investors did NOT appeal the decision!

THANK GOD!
No Casino Gettysburg and Chairperson Susan Star Paddock Receive Three Prestigious Awards
3/19/08 National Parks Conservation Association awarded No Casino Gettysburg their annual Marjory Stoneman Douglas award given to individuals and groups who fight for protection of the National Park system and the environment surrounding the national parks. The award came with $2,500 for chairperson Susan Star Paddock. Paddock donated the $2,500 to the Land Conservancy of Adams County, because of its efforts to preserve the important natural lands, farmland, and historic lands of Adams County.
4/2007 The Civil War Preservation Trust named Paddock the recipient of the Carrington Williams Battlefield Preservationist of the Year award at its annual meeting in Virginia.
4/2007 The Adams County Interfaith Center for Peace and Justice recognized Paddock as its Peacemaker of the Year for the peaceful way she conducted the No Casino campaign.
 
  This is a time for healing.  We hold no animosity toward anyone who was an investor or supporter of the casino.
Our debts have been paid and our organization has dissolved. We believe this has been a vital conversation for Adams County to have. The conversation was about what we Don't Want, but now we need a conversation about what we DO WANT here. That Conversation needs to include EVERYONE.
Our volunteers are already active in township and neighborhood groups throughout the County, ushering in a new era of public participation, enhancing government "of the people, by the people and for the people".
Imagine Adams County...
2.1.07 The PGCB said they rejected Crossroads because it would not bring in money after MD got slots, and because of "well organized, consistent, overwhelming opposition"
We Did It!
Document
2.1.07 press relaese, PGCB reasons
news videos
http://www.whptv.com/mediacenter/local.aspx?videoId=121548


http://www.whptv.com/mediacenter/local.aspx?videoId=121544

http://www.abc27.com/news/stories/1206/381596.html

http://www.wgal.com/news/10573532/detail.html

http://abcnews.go.com/Entertainment/story?id=2740895&page=1
Document
Victory News Stories 12.21.06 ONE
Document
Victory News Stories 12.21.06 TWO
Gettysburg Casino Battle "Top Story 2006" (and 2005)

Gettysburg Times 12.30.06  http://www.gettysburgtimes.com/news/front1.shtml

The single most significant event affecting Adams County in 2006 occurred outside this area and reached its pinnacle when Gettysburg was not included in the conversation.

On Wednesday, Dec. 20, the state Gaming Control Board awarded its two available “at-large” casino licenses to Mount Airy No. 1, in the Poconos, and Bethlehem Sands, in the Lehigh Valley.

That meant denial for the Crossroads Gaming Resort and Spa in Straban Township.

Thus ended, it appears for the moment at least, an issue that divided the community into pros or “Nos.”

The controversy that swirled throughout the year, was the area’s Top Story of 2006, as determined by Gettysburg Times staff members. The casino story garnered 167 of a possible 170 points and was the top story on 15 of 17 ballots.

The proposal was just-as-overwhelmingly the top story of 2005.

The issue came to light on April 26, 2005, when a group of investors, then calling themselves Chance Enterprises, announced their plan to build a slot machine casino along Route 30. Crossroads President and CEO was David LeVan.

Crossroads would build a 3,000 slot machine gaming floor, expanded to 5,000 machines; a 225-room hotel, also expandable; and a 30,000 square foot spa. Pricetag: $350 million.

For nearly two years the potential facility claims of economic gain — Adams County and its municipalities stood to share at least $16 million a year — against preservation of the county’s memorialization as the location of a battle that turned the tide of the American Civil War.

“Everybody has a bad idea at least once in their life,” said a joyful Susan Star Paddock, co-chair of “No Casino Gettysburg” after the decision on Dec. 20.

Mr. LeVan has said he has no plans to appeal the decision.

Evening Sun www.eveningsun.com Top Story of 2006
What a year it's been. It started off slow but finished with a bang. The biggest story of 2006 – the rejection of the casino proposal – didn't end until a few days before Christmas. ...

1. Gaming Board rejects slots parlor After almost two years of yard signs, blogging and bickering, the prospect of a casino in Adams County was squashed the morning of Dec. 20.

The Gaming Control Board voted unanimously to deny the license application of Crossroads Gaming Resort and Spa, LP to build a casino east of Gettysburg. But despite its outcome, the project generated plenty of headlines in 2006. A local group supporting the project, Pro Casino Adams County, formed in February. In the spring, Crossroads moved along with its plans, choosing a casino operator and submitting preliminary development plans. Hundreds testified at public hearings before the gaming board, and more sent in written comments.

Gettysburg-Adams Chamber of Commerce members forced a vote on the issue after its board decided to support it – resulting in a split vote and the board reaffirming their stance. Gettysburg Borough voted to support the project after several meetings and an offer of a guaranteed $1 million per year from Crossroads. Other businesses and local groups took sides.

All the while, then-Rep. Stephen Maitland, R-Gettysburg, pushed a ban on a casino in Adams County through the state house, only to see it killed by a Senate committee in September.

Throughout the summer and fall, zoning hearings on the project dragged on, after initial delays because Crossroads said two members of the board were biased. Eventually, one member was ordered by a judge to recuse herself and the other two ruled to give zoning approval.

Late in the year, national historic preservation groups stepped up their efforts to stop the project by forming a Stop the Slots coalition.

The gaming board held one last hearing on the project Dec. 13, and about 300 people – mostly supporters – packed in to listen. On Dec. 20, the board awarded licenses to Crossroads' competitors in the Poconos and Lehigh Valley.

It's unlikely the controversy will reappear in 2007 – Crossroads investors could still appeal, but we wouldn't bet on that happening. LeVan stated after the Gaming Board's decision, he wasn't interested.

Editorial in Maine Times Record...
http://www.timesrecord.com/WEBSITE/MAIN.nsf/0/52256F926F2897120525724B005FACD4?Opendocument
Battle of Gettysburg: Redux
letters@TimesRecord.Com
12/21/2006
As anyone who has walked the battlefield of Gettysburg knows, a haunting, tangible aura of historic significance permeates the cornfields, ridges and woods of that hallowed ground.

The Peach Orchard. Devil's Den. Wheatfield. Culp's Hill. Cemetery Ridge. Little Round Top. Each site tells a story of sacrifices, horrors and heroism — by the 160,000 soldiers of both the Blue and the Gray armies who fought there in the Civil War's bloodiest battle.

There is no question that this is, as President Abraham Lincoln so eloquently stated in his brief Gettysburg Address, "consecrated" ground — a sacred place that reminds us of "the great task remaining before us ... that government of the people, by the people, for the people shall not perish from the earth."

A different kind of battle over Gettysburg was decided in Harrisburg, Pa., on Wednesday — a two-year battle pitting Civil War buffs and historians against a group of investors wanting to build a casino less than two miles from the battlefield. Casino proponents rolled out the usual arguments: Gettysburg needed to diversify its economy, the casino would create 3,000 jobs and spawn a year-round tourism industry. A strong grassroots campaign countered with passionate arguments in favor of preserving the remaining historic integrity of the Gettysburg battlefield.

The Pennsylvania Gaming Control Board — which ended up approving 11 applications that day for permanent slot-machine gaming operator licenses at various other Pennsylvania locations — denied a gambling license to the investors of the "Crossroads Gaming Resort and Spa."

In doing so, the board affirmed the specialness of Gettysburg as a place to be held in trust for all Americans, both present and future generations. It heeded Lincoln's call that we always will remember Gettysburg as the "final resting place for those who here gave their lives that (our) nation might live."

It's a great victory — for the people of Gettysburg who resisted the tempting allure of easy casino money to fill their town's coffers, and for the rest of us who appreciate the historic significance of that Civil War battlefield in southern Pennsylvania.

It's a reminder, too, of the much larger battle still being fought by the Civil War Preservation Trust and myriad local preservation groups to preserve Civil War battlefields from being paved over for shopping malls or transformed into housing tracts. Nearly 20 percent of Civil War battlefields have already been lost forever for future generations. And of those remaining, only 15 percent are protected by the federal government. Even those that are protected face threats from encroaching development.

Gettysburg has been spared — for now. Let us remain vigilant and mindful of how easily our own historic places can be trivialized, destroyed, forgotten.

http://www.portsmouth-dailytimes.com/articles/2006/12/22/news/front_page/4news_civilwar.prt
Last modified: Friday, December 22, 2006 12:12 AM EST 
 
Local Civil War group wins in casino issue

By JEFF BARRON
PDT Staff Writer

It's been 143 years since 1st Ohio Light Artillery Battery L Brigade fought at the Battle of Gettysburg.

But the Portsmouth-based unit is celebrating one last triumph.

On Wednesday, the Pennsylvania Gaming Control Board denied Silver Point Capital LP's bid to build a casino about a mile from the Gettysburg Military Park.

“This is a tremendous victory for anyone who loves history,” Battery L re-enactment group founder Chip Horr said. “This is pristine land where in three days there were 50,000 casualties (deaths). There are plenty of other places to build a casino with 3,000 slot machines.”

Battery L is memorialized in the park with a monument for fighting at the July 1-3, 1863, battle.

One of the floodwall murals also honors Battery L's efforts at Gettysburg.

The present-day Battery L was one of many re-enactment groups who participated in “Gods and Generals,” a movie about the Battle of Gettysburg.

The members regularly travel to Gettysburg to take care of the monument, which is located near Little Round Top on the battlefield. “That was the battle that changed the course of the war,” Horr said.

The casino plan split many of the people in Gettysburg, as signs for and against casinos were displayed throughout the town. Proponents said the casino would improve the town's economy.

Horr first heard of the plan to build a casino near the battlefield about 1 1/2 years ago.

Many Civil War groups send petitions to the Pennsylvania Legislature protesting the plan, Horr said.

City Engineer and Battery L member Bill Beaumont was one who signed such a petition.

“I'm thrilled to death,” he said. “I'm glad it got shot down. I'd say that all re-enactors in the country are glad they're not putting that casino there.”

Besides possibly taking away from the battlefield's history, Beaumont said the casino would have caused traffic problems in the small town.

“And casinos have the reputation of bringing the wrong type of people around,” he said.

While gambling won't be coming to Gettysburg, Horr said other Civil War battlefields are endangered by developers.

“We're losing our protected lands and our history,” he said. “I don't know what we're getting back.”

Horr said developers are building up areas of some battlefields that the government does not own. Because the government does not own them, it is unable to stop the development.

Gettysburg park officials, however, are trying to restore the battlefield to look exactly the way it did in 1863, Horr said. Much of that process includes cutting down trees that were not there in the 1800s.

For more information about Battery L's involvement in the Battle of Gettysburg, log onto www.batteryl.org.

JEFF BARRON can be reached at (740) 353-3101, ext. 236.

Document
More Editorials after Victory
Document
A good Letter to editor from Charlie Skopic
 

Rendell says Community opposition nixed casino!

"The Gettysburg casino was projected to be a top grosser for the state, Rendell added, "yet it failed because I think the community was listened to."

Capitolwire: Rendell says slots picks a surprise, predicts $1 billion-plus for state.
By 
    Christopher Lilienthal  clilienthal@capitolwire.com  
Staff Reporter  Capitolwire

HARRISBURG (Dec. 20) - Gov. Ed Rendell said the Pennsylvania Gaming Control Board's picks for casino licenses Wednesday were a surprise to him and that he was confident the state's slots industry would generate more than $1 billion a year for property tax cuts.

Rendell said during a conference call with reporters that he was surprised by the board's decision to give the single license available in Pittsburgh to Detroit-based casino developer Don Barden and to reject Donald Trump's plan for a casino in Northwest Philadelphia.

Barden, Rendell said, is the least politically connected of all the license applicants, while Trump is a personal friend of the governor.

The board's decision shows "the board did not listen to any politician, and they did a great job," Rendell said. "One thing, I think, people should start doing is giving this board a little bit of credit for the way they handle all of this under tremendous pressure."...

Rendell rejected some criticism of the board that too little weight was given to local input.

"I think the process got tremendous local input," Rendell said. "I think the number of hearings around the state was extraordinarily high. And I think the communities were listened to, to the extent that they could be listened to. Nobody wants a casino anywhere near them. This is like nobody wants an office tower anywhere near them, nobody wants a supermarket anywhere near them."

He cited the rejection of the Trump project and a project proposed by developer Crossroads Gaming Resort and Spa to build a casino near the Gettysburg Battlefield as proof that local input was taken into consideration.

"I didn't hear this from Chairman Decker, but my guess is if Donald Trump was down on the [Delaware] river, separated by [Interstate Route] 95 from community groups, he might have gotten a license. So I think the community was listened to," Rendell said.

The Gettysburg casino was projected to be a top grosser for the state, Rendell added, "yet it failed because I think the community was listened to."...



Investor Will Not Appeal Decision

gettysburgtimes.com 12/22/06
LeVan sees no appeal of slots denial
BY JOHN MESSEDER
Times Staff Writer
As far as Crossroads President and CEO David LeVan is concerned, a proposal to build a casino at the intersection of U.S. Routes 15 and 30 died with the state Gaming Control Board’s decision Wednesday not to award the company a slot machine operator license.
“The hurdle that you would have to overcome to overturn this decision is so high that it would
be really a waste of time, money and quite frankly energy, so it’s not something that I personally
have any interest in,”
LeVan told Fred Snyder on AM-1320 WGET Thursday morning.
But LeVan emphasized he had not spoken with the other
investors and was speaking only for himself.
“If others included in the group have a different view and they want to pursue that, obviously I’m
not going to stand in their way,” he said. “But I have no interest in it.”
LeVan said he had heard rumors of political influence in the decision-making but decided to apply for a license anyway, believing the process would be “fair and balanced.”
“I heard a lot of things along the way that would suggest otherwise, (but have) no facts to prove that,” he said.
He noted a press conference held by Adams County Commissioner Tom Weaver in which the commissioner called for an Attorney General’s investigation into the process, but LeVan said he would not be participating in his (Weaver’s) efforts.

Website powered by Network Solutions®